Assault
One common area included within the scope of
personal injury law is that of “assault”, an intentional
act or threat which instills fear of imminent physical harm in
an individual. No actual touching need take place for an assault
to occur: The threat alone is sufficient to be covered by personal
injury laws. If the threat actually becomes a reality in which
an individual is non-consensually touched by an object or person,
the assault becomes a battery. For example, if a person brandished
a gun at another person and threatens to shoot, an assault has
been committed. A battery occurs if the person actually follows
through and succeeds in shooting the person he has threatened.
Both of these instances are covered under personal injury law
in that a victim has the right to monetary recovery for the wrongful
acts perpetrated upon him or her. In the example above, a criminal
case might also ensue against the wrongdoer.
Battery
The word "battery" comes from the Latin "battuere" meaning
"to beat." In a legal sense, battery occurs when a perpetrator
willfully touches or uses force against a person without his or
her consent. The act of battery must include actual physical contact
between the perpetrator and the victim or to an object connected
to the victim. Throwing an object which strikes another individual
is a clear case of battery. An example of battery in which there
is no actual touching of the victim would be knocking a tray full
of food out of another's hands.
Conversion
Conversion is the wrongful act of dominion
or control over the chattels (personal property) of another,
in denial of the rightful owner’s rights thereto.
To prove conversion these elements must be present:
- The plaintiff must have greater right to the property than
the defendant
- A wrongful taking by the defendant without consent of the Plaintiff
- Possession by the Defendant which is inconsistent
with the Plaintiff’s rights
- Damage to the Plaintiff
Infliction Of Emotional Distress
When one person purposefully engages in behavior
that is intended to and does cause severe mental anguish in another,
he or she is subject to the laws regarding the intentional infliction
of emotional distress. There are several factors which determine
the extent to which a perpetrator may be liable in such a claim.
First, the wrongdoer's behavior must be deemed as extreme and
outrageous. If a person of average temperament would suffer emotional
distress caused by the wrongdoer's actions, then those actions
can be deemed as "outrageous."
Consideration would also need to be taken for those individuals
whose temperament is more sensitive or high-strung: in cases such
as this, the standard for outrageousness can be lowered. Second,
it must be done intentionally to cause emotional distress or with
reckless disregard to such a consideration. Third, it is also helpful
if the victim can show other non-emotional damages such as loss
of gainful employment.
An example of intentional inflection of emotional distress would
be an aide in a nursing home telling an aged resident that her
family has died, when they had not, just to disturb the resident.
False Imprisonment
If an individual inhibits or prevents another's freedom of movement
without their consent for any amount of time, he or she has falsely
imprisoned that person. This imprisonment may include a physical
element to prevent escape, such as being bound with rope, as well
as verbal threats of harm to the victim. There are several key
factors that contribute to the claim of false imprisonment. First,
the confinement must be non-consensual on the victim's part. Second,
the confinement must be intentional on the part of the perpetrator.
Third, the victim has to have knowledge that he or she is indeed
imprisoned. Last, there can be no available means of escape known
to the victim.
Fraud / Misrepresentation
A person commits fraud when he or she knowingly
makes a material misrepresentation with the intent of inducing
another person to act or refrain from acting to his or her detriment.
It is also necessary to show that the material misrepresentation
was justifiably relied upon when the “victim” acted
or failed to act.
“Negligent misrepresentation" occurs
when, in the course of a transaction in which a person has a
pecuniary interest, a person supplies another with false information
to guide their business transaction. That person who so misrepresents
can be liable for any pecuniary loss caused by the justifiable
reliance upon that false information.
Trespass To Land
The tort of trespass protects one’s interest in the exclusive
possession of one’s land. This is distinguished from the
tort of
"nuisance" which protects one’s interest in the free and unhindered
use and enjoyment of land.
A person is subject to liability for trespass, irrespective of
whether he causes harm, if he intentionally:
- Enters the land or causes another to do so
- Remains on the land when asked to leave
- Fails to remove from the land a thing he is under a duty to
remove
Trespass To Chattels
"Chattel" refers to items of personal
property. A person commits trespass to chattel if he or she intentionally
possesses someone else's property without their consent, even
if only for a brief period of time. Courts require that some
sort of actual harm results from the trespass to chattel in order
for it to be actionable.
Types Of Damages
Compensatory Damages
The word "compensate" means "to offset an error
or undesirable effect". Compensatory damages, therefore, are
meant to make up for an injury sustained by an individual. There
are two basic types of compensatory damages: actual and general.
Actual damages reimburse an individual for funds paid out-of-pocket
for medical treatments, lost wages, substitute transportation,
property replacement or repair, and rehabilitation. An accident
victim can also sue for general damages, which include estimates
of loss not involving actual monetary expenditure. Mental anguish,
disfigurement, future medical expenses, future lost wages, long-term
pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and loss of opportunity
are all examples of general damages.
Punitive Damages
Punitive damages are meant to punish a defendant for acts of gross
negligence or intentional misconduct that cause personal injury
to the plaintiff. They are not calculated by the extent of the
actual injury, but rather are meant to prevent the defendant or
others in similar situations from allowing or causing the same
sort of accident to happen in the future. For example, if a person
intentionally runs an automobile into a pedestrian, punitive damages
may be appropriate.
Nominal Damages
In a case where the evidence of actual damages is slight, the
courts may still choose to award the plaintiff a small sum of money
to acknowledge that he or she was legally wronged by the defendant.
These nominal damages may only be sought in intentional tort cases
where a physical injury to the plaintiff is not required for a
defendant to be found guilty. If the tort committed is battery,
for example, the defendant may indeed have shoved the plaintiff
in an offensive manner but without causing physical injury. The
plaintiff may then be awarded a minimal amount of nominal damages.
Court Costs and Attorney's Fees
If a personal injury case is settled in favor of the plaintiff,
he or she may also have recourse to recover some of the expenses
of taking the case to court. These court costs would include filing
and process server fees, obtaining deposition and court transcripts,
and payment to translators. There are some instances in which a
plaintiff may also be able to recover attorney and expert witness
fees, but this is not as common.
|